let n = 0;
while(true){
n++;
if(n == 10000) {
break;
}
}
let n = 0;
while(true) {
n++;
if(n > 9999) {
break;
}
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
== | |
> |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
== | 217077.9 Ops/sec |
> | 218852.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition and Comparison
The provided benchmark compares two common equality operators in JavaScript: ===
( strict equality) and ==
(loose equality). The comparison is between two approaches:
===
)n
must be exactly equal to 10000 (both in value and type).==
)n
can be any number close to 10000.Pros and Cons
===
)==
)2 == 3
).Other Considerations
In general, when working with numerical values, ===
is a safer choice to ensure exact equality. However, when dealing with strings or other non-numeric types, ==
might be more suitable due to its flexibility.
Library and Special Features
There are no specific libraries used in these benchmarks. However, the use of while (true)
loops is notable. In JavaScript, while
loops can be useful for creating infinite loops, which is what's happening here.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives could have been explored, such as:
===
with a small tolerance for floating-point precision issues.==
and then performing a subsequent type check to verify the result.!==
or ===
with a custom implementation.Additional Considerations
When running benchmarks, it's essential to consider factors that might affect performance, such as:
Keep in mind that the results may vary depending on the specific use case, environment, and hardware configuration.