Benchmark: Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster2?

Tests:

test equality
var n = 0; while(true) { n++; if(100000==n) break; }
test strict equality
var n = 0; while(true) { n++; if(100000===n) break; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
test equality
test strict equality

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/117.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Opera 117 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
test equality	54383.0 Ops/sec
test strict equality	54308.3 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 5 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition represents a comparison between two JavaScript operators: `==` (loose equality) and `===` (strict equality). The question asks whether there is a performance benefit to replacing `==` with `===`.

**Options Compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **Loose Equality (`==`)**: This operator checks if the values of two variables are equal, without considering their data types.
2. **Strict Equality (`===`)**: This operator checks if both the value and data type of two variables are equal.

**Pros and Cons**

**Loose Equality (`==`)**

Pros:

* Faster execution: Loose equality is faster because it only checks the values, not the data types.
* More flexible: Loose equality allows for implicit conversions between data types.

Cons:

* Less reliable: Loose equality can lead to unexpected results due to type coercion.
* Security risks: Loose equality can be exploited by attackers to bypass security checks.

**Strict Equality (`===`)**

Pros:

* More reliable: Strict equality ensures that both the value and data type are equal, reducing the risk of unexpected results.
* Better security: Strict equality helps prevent security vulnerabilities like DOM-based XSS attacks.

Cons:

* Slower execution: Strict equality is slower because it checks both the value and data type.
* Less flexible: Strict equality requires explicit comparisons between values and types.

**Library and Special JS Feature**

There is no library used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript has several special features that might be relevant to this benchmark, such as:

* `Number()` function: This function can convert a value to a number, which might affect the performance of loose equality.
* Type coercion: JavaScript performs type coercion when using loose equality, which can lead to unexpected results.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to measure the performance difference between `==` and `===` in a different context, you could consider using other benchmarking frameworks or libraries. Some popular alternatives include:

* Benchmark.js
* Microbenchmark
* jsperf

These tools provide more advanced features and options for customizing your benchmarks.

In summary, the provided JSON data tests the performance difference between loose equality (`==`) and strict equality (`===`), highlighting the trade-offs between speed, reliability, and security.

Related benchmarks:

Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster2? (version: 0)

Is there a performance benefit to replacing == with ===?

Comparing performance of: test equality vs test strict equality

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

test equality

test strict equality

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 5 months ago):