Benchmark: Which comparison operator (> vs ===) is faster?

Tests:

test greater than
var n = 0; while (true) { n++; if (n > 9999) break; }
test strict equality
var n = 0; while (true) { n++; if (n === 100000) break; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
test greater than
test strict equality

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/105.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 105 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
test greater than	157397.4 Ops/sec
test strict equality	15738.7 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this JavaScript benchmark.

**Overview**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of two comparison operators: `>` (greater than) and `===` (strict equality). The test is designed to measure which operator is faster, allowing users to determine if there's a performance benefit to using one over the other.

**Comparison Operators Compared**

There are two main comparison operators being compared:

1. **>` (Greater Than)**: This operator checks if the left operand is greater than the right operand.
2. **`===` (Strict Equality)**: This operator checks if both operands have the same value and data type.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

Here are some pros and cons of using each comparison operator:

* `>`:
	+ Pros: Simple to use, easy to understand, and widely supported.
	+ Cons: May not be as accurate or precise as `===`, especially when dealing with floating-point numbers or NaN (Not a Number) values.
* `===`:
	+ Pros: More accurate and precise than `>`, ensuring that the operands have both the same value and data type. This is particularly important in numerical calculations where precision matters.
	+ Cons: May be slower due to its additional checks, potentially impacting performance.

**Library Usage**

The provided benchmark code does not explicitly use any libraries, but it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines may optimize certain operations or functions used within the benchmark, which could affect the results. However, without further context, it's difficult to determine if any specific library is being used or if optimization is being applied.

**Special JS Features**

There are no special JavaScript features mentioned in this benchmark. The code only uses basic syntax and operators.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative approaches to compare the performance of `>` and `===`, consider the following:

1. **Use a more precise comparison operator**: Instead of using `>` or `===`, consider using more precise comparison operators like `>=` (greater than or equal to), `<=` (less than or equal to), or `isNaN()` for handling NaN values.
2. **Use a benchmarking library**: There are several benchmarking libraries available, such as Benchmark.js or Fastify, that provide more advanced features and optimization capabilities for running performance tests.

In summary, the provided benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two common comparison operators: `>` (greater than) and `===` (strict equality). The results can help users determine if there's a performance benefit to using one over the other.

Related benchmarks:

Which comparison operator (> vs ===) is faster? (version: 0)

Is there a performance benefit to replacing > with ===?

Comparing performance of: test greater than vs test strict equality

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

test greater than

test strict equality

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):