var n = -999;
while(true) {
n++;
if(n > -1)
break;
}
var n = -999;
while(true) {
n++;
if(n === -1)
break;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
test greater than | |
test strict equality |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
test greater than | 2616025.0 Ops/sec |
test strict equality | 2621119.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help explain the benchmark and its results.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two operators: >
(greater than) and '==='
(strict equality). The test aims to determine whether replacing >
with '!==```(not equal to)
has any noticeable performance benefits.
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the execution speed of two approaches:
>
operator for greater-than comparison.>
operator with `'!==`` (strict inequality).Pros and Cons
>
):In general, for simple numerical comparisons, the >
operator is sufficient. However, when working with more complex logic or ensuring precise control over equality checks, using `'!==`` (strict inequality) might be a better choice.
Library Usage
The benchmark does not explicitly mention any libraries used in the provided test cases. However, it's likely that standard JavaScript functionality is being utilized without external dependencies.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no specific features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
For similar benchmarks, you might explore other microbenchmarking tools like:
These alternatives can provide more advanced features, customization options, and support for various programming languages.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its results!