var vals = ["sasa", "baba"];
`{ name: "Matheus de Sousa Martins", age: 30, phone: "999999999999", val:["sasa", "baba"]}`
JSON.stringify({ name: "Matheus de Sousa Martins", age: 30, phone: "999999999999", val:vals });
`{ name: "Matheus de Sousa Martins", age: 30, phone: "999999999999", val:${vals}}`
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
strings | |
JSON.stringify | |
string with values |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
strings | 888398016.0 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 1550616.0 Ops/sec |
string with values | 4484985.5 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the provided JSON benchmark.
Benchmark Definition The JSON benchmark is used to compare the performance of three different approaches:
+
operator or string interpolation (${}
) with template literals.JSON.stringify()
function to convert an object to a string.${}
) with template literals, where the value is a variable (vals
).Options Comparison
Library Usage
None of the test cases explicitly use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that vals
is assigned in the Script Preparation Code, which suggests that the tests are designed to work on a specific JavaScript context or environment.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark uses template literals with string interpolation (${}
) and the JSON.stringify()
function, which are both modern JavaScript features. However, since template literals were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), this benchmark may not be compatible with older JavaScript environments or versions.
Alternative Approaches
In summary, the benchmark provides a fair comparison of three different approaches for creating strings in JavaScript. While it highlights some potential performance issues with string concatenation and JSON.stringify, it also showcases the benefits of using template literals with string interpolation.