var array = ["test1", "test2"]
var str = JSON.stringify(array);
JSON.parse(str);
str.split(',')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON.parse | |
String.split |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON.parse | 3125904.2 Ops/sec |
String.split | 5133933.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition:
The test compares two approaches for parsing a string:
JSON.parse(str)
str.split(',')
Options Compared:
The two options are compared in terms of their execution speed, measured in executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond).
Pros and Cons:
Library:
None. This test does not use any external library or framework.
Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, note that JSON.parse
uses the ECMAScript 5 JSON parsing syntax (JSON.parse()
) which may be relevant to modern JavaScript engines.
Other Alternatives:
If you needed to parse a string in JavaScript, other alternatives might include:
However, it's worth noting that JSON.parse
is generally the recommended way to parse JSON data in modern JavaScript, and it's widely supported by most browsers and Node.js implementations.
Benchmark Preparation Code:
The script preparation code creates an array array
with two elements, which is then stringified using JSON.stringify()
to produce a string str
. This string will be used as input for the benchmarking tests.
Individual Test Cases:
The test cases compare the execution speed of JSON.parse(str)
and str.split(',')
. The first test case uses JSON.parse(str)
, while the second test case uses str.split(',')
.
In the provided benchmark results, Chrome 110 executes str.split(',')
faster than JSON.parse(str)
, with an executions per second value of 5133933.0 compared to 3125904.25 for JSON.parse(str)
.