var array = new Array(5).fill('1');
var str = JSON.stringify(array);
JSON.parse(str);
str.split(',')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JSON.parse | |
String.split |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JSON.parse | 5901454.0 Ops/sec |
String.split | 8730421.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Purpose
The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: string splitting using str.split(',')
and JSON parsing using JSON.parse(str)
.
String Splitting (str.split(',')
)
The script preparation code creates an array with 5 elements, all filled with the value '1'. The resulting string is then split into individual elements by commas. This test measures the performance of this simple string manipulation technique.
Pros:
Cons:
JSON Parsing (JSON.parse(str)
)
The script preparation code creates an array with 5 elements, all filled with the value '1', which is then converted to a JSON string using JSON.stringify(array)
. This test measures the performance of parsing this JSON string.
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
In this benchmark, the JSON
library is used. The JSON.parse()
function takes a JSON string as input and returns an object representing the parsed data.
Pros:
Cons: None notable in this context.
Special JavaScript Feature
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It's a straightforward test of string manipulation techniques.
Alternatives to String Splitting
If str.split(',')
is not efficient enough for your use case, consider the following alternatives:
RegExp.prototype.exec()
method to split strings based on specific patterns.Alternatives to JSON Parsing
If JSON.parse(str)
is not the best fit, consider the following alternatives:
XMLSerializer
or DOMParser
to parse JSON data.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and might not be suitable for all use cases.