Benchmark: JSON Stringify vs every

Script Preparation code:

var one = [1, 2, 3];
var two = [1, 2, 3];

Tests:

JSON
JSON.stringify(one) === JSON.stringify(two)
Every
one.every((value,index) => value === two[index])

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
JSON
Every

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 104 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
JSON	1603574.6 Ops/sec
Every	3902724.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 7 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches: using `JSON.stringify()` and using the `every()` method.

**Options Compared**

1. **JSON.stringify()**: This approach converts the arrays `one` and `two` into strings and then compares them for equality.
2. **every() method**: This approach uses a callback function to iterate over the elements of both arrays and checks if each element is equal using the `===` operator.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **JSON.stringify():**
	* Pros:
		+ Simple and straightforward implementation.
		+ Easy to understand and maintain.
	* Cons:
		+ May not be efficient for large datasets due to the overhead of converting arrays to strings.
		+ Can lead to performance issues if used in loops or with high repetition rates.
2. **every() method:**
	* Pros:
		+ Efficient for large datasets, as it uses a single loop and avoids unnecessary conversions.
		+ Suitable for use in loops or with high repetition rates.
	* Cons:
		+ May require more code to implement correctly (e.g., handling edge cases).
		+ Can be less straightforward to understand than the `JSON.stringify()` approach.

**Library and Special JS Feature**

There is no library used in this benchmark. However, the `every()` method uses a special JavaScript feature: a callback function. In the provided code, the callback function takes two arguments: `value` (the current element being processed) and `index` (the index of the current element).

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between these two approaches.
* The use of Chrome 104 as a test browser might be biased towards that version, as it may have optimized the JavaScript engine for better performance.

**Alternatives**

1. Other array comparison methods: Other approaches, such as using `array.every()` or implementing a custom loop, could be used instead of `JSON.stringify()`.
2. Alternative libraries: Depending on the specific use case, other libraries (e.g., Lodash) might provide more efficient and convenient ways to compare arrays.
3. Different browsers or environments: Running the benchmark in different browsers or environments (e.g., Node.js, Safari) could help determine whether the results are browser- or environment-specific.

In summary, this benchmark compares two simple approaches for comparing arrays: using `JSON.stringify()` and using the `every()` method. While both have their pros and cons, the `every()` method is generally more efficient for large datasets due to its optimized implementation and reduced overhead.

Related benchmarks:

JSON Stringify vs every (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: JSON vs Every

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

JSON

Every

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 7 months ago):