var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = params.slice();
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [params];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 7328481.0 Ops/sec |
spread | 5836691.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two ways to create a copy of an array in JavaScript: using Array.prototype.slice()
and the spread operator (...
). The script preparation code is empty, which means it only contains the test cases. There are no HTML-related codes provided for the benchmark setup.
Options Being Compared
There are two options being compared:
Array.prototype.slice()
: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by iterating over its elements and returning a new array with the same elements....
): This operator creates a new array by spreading out the elements of an existing array.Pros/Cons of Each Approach
Array.prototype.slice()
:...
):Array.prototype.slice()
, works well for small to medium-sized arrays, and is generally faster than slice()
for large arrays (O(1)).slice()
for very large arrays, as it needs to create a new array object. Additionally, modern JavaScript engines have optimized the spread operator, making it more efficient.Library Used
None explicitly mentioned in this benchmark definition, but it's worth noting that some browsers may use internal implementation details or polyfills for the spread operator.
Special JS Feature/Syntax (Not applicable)
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
slice()
and the spread operator.Alternative Benchmarks
Other benchmarks could compare:
Array.from()
, Buffer.copy()
, or Uint8Array.slice()
.Keep in mind that the choice of benchmark depends on specific use cases and performance considerations.