var a = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var b = a.slice();
var b = [ a ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | 42144496.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 29822014.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarking.
Benchmark Definition and Purpose
The provided JSON represents a simple benchmark that compares two approaches to create a shallow copy of an array: Array.prototype.slice()
vs the ES6 spread operator ([ ...a ]
).
Options Compared
[ ...a ]
): This syntax creates a new array with elements taken from the original array.Pros and Cons
Array.prototype.slice()
:[ ...a ]
):slice()
for large arrays.Library and Purpose
None in this specific benchmark. However, the spread operator relies on the Symbol.iterator
and Array.prototype.forEach
methods internally, which are built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The ES6 spread operator ([ ...a ]
) uses a new syntax feature introduced by ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This feature allows for concise array creation using the ...
operator.
Other Considerations
Alternatives
map()
, filter()
)By expanding the benchmark suite and considering various factors, you can gain a better understanding of your JavaScript code's performance characteristics.