var params = Array(100).fill('Hello World');
var other = params.slice();
var other = [ params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice operator | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice operator | 15912808.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 6572069.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what is being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two methods for creating a copy of an array: the traditional slice()
method and the new ES6 spread operator ([ ...params ]
).
Options Being Compared
There are two options being compared:
slice()
method: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by specifying a start index, end index, and step value.var other = params.slice();
[ ...params ]
): This method creates a new array by spreading the elements of the original array into a new array.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
slice()
method[ ...params ]
)slice()
for small arrays or arrays with few unique elements.Library and Special JS Feature
In this benchmark, the following library is used:
None. This benchmark does not use any external libraries.
No special JavaScript features are mentioned in the provided code snippets.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to creating an array copy include:
Array.from()
: This method creates a new array from an array-like object or iterable.var other = Array.from(params);
map()
and concat()
: This approach creates a new array by mapping over the original array and concatenating the results.var other = params.map((x) => x).concat();
However, these approaches may have performance issues or be less intuitive than the spread operator.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The preparation code sets up an array of 100 elements, each containing the string "Hello World".
var params = Array(100).fill('Hello World');
This creates a large array that can be efficiently copied using the spread operator.