var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
params.push(1);
params.push(2);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
params.push( [1, 2]);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
for (let i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
params.push(i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
concat | |
spread | |
push | |
push spread | |
push loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
concat | 5088675.5 Ops/sec |
spread | 25623206.0 Ops/sec |
push | 31491736.0 Ops/sec |
push spread | 20276386.0 Ops/sec |
push loop | 32971132.0 Ops/sec |
Measuring the performance of different JavaScript array operations is crucial for optimizing code and improving overall application performance.
The provided benchmark definition measures the execution time of four different approaches to add elements to an array:
concat
): This involves using the +
operator or the concat()
method to merge two arrays.spread
): This uses the ...
operator to spread the elements of one array into another.push
): This adds elements to an array using the push()
method without spreading any other array.push spread
): Similar to the previous option, but spreads another array before adding elements.Pros and Cons of each approach:
concat
):spread
):push
):push spread
):Other considerations:
spread
) is generally recommended due to its efficiency and modernity.push
), while simple and fast, can lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully. It's essential to understand the implications of modifying an array while iterating over it.Library usage:
There are no libraries mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. All operations rely on built-in JavaScript methods or syntax features.
Special JS feature/syntax:
The spread syntax (spread
) relies on ES6+ syntax support, which is widely adopted but not compatible with older browsers or versions of JavaScript. Other approaches use standard JavaScript methods (e.g., concat()
, push()
).
Alternatives to these benchmarks:
setLength()
, splice()
, or slice()
.Keep in mind that the performance characteristics of these approaches can vary depending on specific use cases and environments.