var params = Array(2000000).fill(2);
var other = [ params, 1 ]
var params = Array(2000000).fill(2);
var other = params.push(1);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
spread operator | 47.5 Ops/sec |
Push | 59.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition: The benchmark is designed to compare three approaches for concatenating an array:
push()
method to add elements to the end of the array....
): Utilizing the new ES6 spread operator to create a new array by copying and extending the original array.Options Compared:
The benchmark compares the performance of these two methods (Push and Spread Operator) for concatenating an array with a large size (2000000 elements, filled with 2). The Push method involves calling push()
on the end of the array to add new elements, while the Spread Operator creates a new array by copying the original array's elements and adding a single element (1).
Pros and Cons:
...
):Library and Special JS Features:
The benchmark uses no external libraries. However, it does utilize a JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018): the spread operator (...
). The spread operator allows for concise array creation by expanding an existing array or object into a new one.
Other Considerations:
Alternatives: In addition to the two methods being compared in this benchmark, other approaches for array concatenation exist:
concat()
Method: This is another widely supported method for concatenating arrays. While it may have similar performance characteristics to the Push method, its syntax can be less readable.array.prototype.reduce()
Method: Some browsers support using reduce()
to concatenate arrays. However, this approach often requires more code and can lead to less cache locality.For a simple array concatenation task, the Spread Operator (...
) is generally recommended due to its concise syntax and performance benefits.