var params = new Array(10000);
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = new Array(10000);
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = new Array(10000);
var other = [ 1, 2 ].push(params);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 749581.1 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 15125.6 Ops/sec |
Push | 4078.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case on MeasureThat.net, which compares three approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: Array.prototype.concat
, the spread operator (...
), and the push()
method with spread syntax.
Options Compared
...
): Introduced in ES6, this operator allows for more concise array creation and manipulation.push()
method to add elements to an existing array, followed by the spread operator (...
) to pass additional arguments.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
...
):concat()
. Supports multiple arrays and iterables.Library Used (if any)
None of the benchmark test cases explicitly use any external libraries. However, some JavaScript implementations might include built-in optimizations or assumptions that could affect the results.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The benchmark test cases use modern JavaScript features:
...
)var params = new Array(10000);
is not used in the latest code; but in the previous benchmark the var was there)const
or let
declarations, which is a common pattern in older JavaScript implementations.Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to concatenate arrays include:
set()
method, but not widely supported.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches might have different performance characteristics and requirements for browser support.