var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = Array.prototype.map.call(params, function(value) {return value});
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ params].map(function(value) {return value});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.map.call() | |
[...array].map() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.map.call() | 22294142.0 Ops/sec |
[...array].map() | 11816997.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition: The website is comparing two approaches for mapping over an array in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.map.call()
[...array].map()
(using the new ES6 spread operator)These two approaches are being compared to determine which one is faster.
Options Compared:
Array.prototype.map.call(params, function(value) {return value})
- This method uses the call()
method to invoke the map()
function with an array as its first argument.[...params].map(function(value) {return value})
- This method uses the spread operator ([...]
) to create a new array from the original array, and then calls the map()
function on this new array.Pros and Cons:
call()
on an array.Library:
There is no library being used in this benchmark. The two methods are comparing different approaches to mapping over an array, which is a built-in JavaScript feature.
Special JS Feature/Syntax:
The spread operator ([...]
) was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and has become a widely supported feature across modern browsers and versions of JavaScript. However, older browsers and versions may not support this syntax.
Other Alternatives:
forEach()
instead of map()
. This method would iterate over the array and perform the desired operation on each element, but it would not return a new array.Overall, this benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for mapping over an array in JavaScript, highlighting the trade-offs between traditional methods and newer, faster alternatives.