var params = [];
params.push(2)
params.push(3)
params.push(4)
var other = params.slice();
var other = [ params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | 9524618.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 9110497.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares the performance of two approaches to create a shallow copy of an array: Array.prototype.slice()
and the new ES6 spread operator (...
).
Approaches Compared
There are two test cases:
Array.prototype.slice()
: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by slicing it from the beginning to the end....
): This operator creates a new array with the elements of the original array.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Array.prototype.slice()
...
)Array.prototype.slice()
.Library and Special JS Features
There is no library used in this benchmark. However, note that the ...
spread operator was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as a feature, which means it may not be supported in older browsers or environments.
Other Alternatives
Other alternatives to create an array copy include:
Array.from()
: Creates an array from an iterable.Object.assign()
: Copies the properties of one object to another.JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())
: Creates a deep copy of an object, but be aware that this method can lead to performance issues for large objects.In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches to create an array copy: Array.prototype.slice()
and the spread operator (...
). The spread operator is more concise and expressive, but may have browser compatibility issues or lead to increased memory usage.