var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = Array.prototype.slice.call(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | 9125611.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 18804008.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The test compares two approaches to create an array from an existing one:
start
and end
, which define the range of elements to include in the new array.[...]
syntax followed by the expression that should be expanded into an array.Options compared
The test compares these two approaches:
Pros and cons of each approach
Array.prototype.slice.call()
).Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark, but it's worth noting that some implementations of the spread operator may rely on underlying libraries or frameworks to provide additional functionality or optimizations. However, the core syntax itself does not require any external dependencies.
Special JS feature or syntax
The benchmark uses a special JavaScript feature known as rest/spread syntax, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows for more concise and expressive ways to create arrays from existing ones. The spread operator ([...]
) is used to expand an expression into an array, whereas the ...
syntax is used to "spread" elements into a new array.
Other alternatives
If you need to achieve similar results without using the spread operator or slice method, some alternative approaches include:
Array.from()
and passing an iterable (e.g., an array or string) as an argument.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as efficient or concise as the spread operator or slice method, depending on the specific use case and requirements.