const obj = {a: { e: { i: 6 } } };
const i = obj.a.e.i;
console.log(i);
const obj = {a: { e: { i: 6 } } };
const { i } = obj.a.e;
console.log(i);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Assign | |
Destructure |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Assign | 32697.6 Ops/sec |
Destructure | 33048.8 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and explain what's being tested, the options compared, pros and cons of each approach, library usage, special JavaScript features or syntax, and alternative approaches.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: assigning a value to a variable versus destructuring an object in JavaScript. The benchmark measures how many executions per second are possible for each approach.
Options Compared
There are only two options compared:
6
to a variable, e.g., const i = obj.a.e.i;
.6
from an object, e.g., const { i } = obj.a.e;
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library Usage
There are no libraries used in this benchmark. The JavaScript code is self-contained.
Special JavaScript Features or Syntax
The benchmark uses the Destructuring syntax, which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows extracting values from objects into separate variables, making it more concise and expressive.
Alternative Approaches
Other approaches to compare assignments could include:
However, for JavaScript specifically, the destructuring approach is likely to be the most relevant alternative.
In summary, this benchmark compares two common approaches in JavaScript: assigning a value to a variable versus using destructuring syntax to extract values from objects. The results can help developers optimize their code and understand the performance implications of each approach.