const attrib = [{name: 'a'}, {name: 'b'}, {name: 'x'}]
attrib.find(a => a.name === 'x')
const attrib = [{name: 'a'}, {name: 'b'}, {name: 'x'}]
attrib.find(({name}) => name === 'x')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Assign | |
Destructure |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Assign | 71198528.0 Ops/sec |
Destructure | 74409784.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: finding an element in an array using assignment (assign
) versus destructuring an object (using the find()
method with destructuring syntax).
Assignment Approach
In this approach, the assign
method uses a traditional array indexing technique to find the desired element. The attrib.find()
method is used to search for the first element that satisfies the condition a => a.name === 'x'
. In essence, the code is using a loop to iterate through each element in the array and checks if its name
property matches 'x'
.
Pros:
Cons:
Destructuring Approach
In this approach, the find()
method is used with destructuring syntax to search for the first element that satisfies the condition. The code uses a single expression { (name) => name === 'x' }
and applies it to each element in the array using (a) => { ... }(a)
.
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
There is no library usage in this benchmark. The code uses only built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark utilizes a modern JavaScript feature: destructuring syntax ({ (name) => name === 'x' }
). This syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and allows for concise and expressive way to define functions that take an object as an argument. In this case, the destructuring syntax is used within the find()
method to search for the desired element.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to measure performance or optimize code, consider using:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different focuses or requirements compared to MeasureThat.net's microbenchmarking approach.
I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have further questions.