var obj = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 }
var a = obj.a
const { a, rest } = obj
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Traditional assignment | |
Destructuring assignment |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Traditional assignment | 1826711808.0 Ops/sec |
Destructuring assignment | 16854028.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to variable assignment from an object: traditional assignment using var
and destructuring assignment using destructuring syntax ({ variable, ... } = obj
). The tests are checking which approach is faster in terms of execution frequency per second (ExecutionsPerSecond).
Options compared
There are only two options being compared:
var
keyword to assign a value to a variable inside an object.var a = obj.a;
const { a, ...rest } = obj;
Pros and Cons of each approach
Traditional assignment:
Pros:
Cons:
var a = obj.a
can be executed before obj.a
is defined).Destructuring assignment:
Pros:
Cons:
Library and purpose
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition, but it's likely that the obj
object is a simple JavaScript object created using the var
keyword.
Special JS feature or syntax
The test cases use destructuring syntax ({ ... } = obj
), which is a relatively modern feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). While most modern browsers and Node.js versions support it, older environments may not. This means that the results might be skewed by browser differences.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to test alternative approaches, some possible options could include:
let
or const
instead of var
.obj.a = ...
) or the Object.assign()
method.Keep in mind that these alternatives would require modifications to the benchmark definition and test cases.