a = Array(10000);
b = Array(300)
a.splice(0, b.length, b);
for (let i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {
a[i] = b[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array.splice | |
for loop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array.splice | 667386.0 Ops/sec |
for loop | 425431.5 Ops/sec |
The benchmark being assessed compares two different methods of populating an array in JavaScript:
splice
method.for
loop.Both methods are tested within the context of modifying an array a
with the elements from another array b
.
a = Array(10000);
b = Array(300);
a
: An array is initialized with a length of 10,000. Initially, this array is empty but will be populated with the contents from array b
.b
: An array is initialized with a length of 300, which is the number of elements we want to insert into a
.array.splice
Method:
a.splice(0, b.length, ...b);
splice
method is called on the array a
to remove elements starting from index 0
and replace them with elements spread from array b
.Pros:
splice
is a standard method for adding/removing elements without needing a loop, which can lead to cleaner, more readable code.a
in place.Cons:
splice
can be less performant for larger arrays as it may involve internal shifting of array elements and can carry function-call overhead.for loop
Method:
for (let i = 0; i < b.length; i++) {
a[i] = b[i];
}
for
loop iterates over each element in array b
, directly assigning its values to the first part of array a
.Pros:
splice
.Cons:
The benchmark results show the number of executed operations per second for each method:
array.splice
: 643,831.5 executions per second.for loop
: 416,554.59375 executions per second.The benchmark indicates that the splice
method outperforms the for
loop in this particular scenario. However, it's essential to consider the context where each method will be used.
Other Alternatives:
concat()
, map()
, or using the spread operator in different contexts can also be alternatives.Uint8Array
) could be considered, though they come with different use-cases and intricacies.Ultimately, when choosing a method, one should consider readability, maintainability, and performance based on the specific requirements of the application being developed.