var array = [].fill(1,0,10000)
for(var x=0; x<array.length; x++){
delete array[x]
}
while(array.length - 3 > 0){
array.splice(2,1)
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
delete | |
splice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
delete | 67623640.0 Ops/sec |
splice | 66788616.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition and Purpose
The provided benchmark definition is to compare the performance of two approaches: delete
and splice
. Both approaches are used to remove elements from an array in JavaScript. The goal of this benchmark is to determine which approach is faster.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
delete
operator to remove individual elements from the array.splice()
method to remove multiple elements from the array at once.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Delete
Pros:
Cons:
delete
operations if an array is modified frequently, leading to slower performance due to the overhead of repeated checks.Splice
Pros:
Cons:
Library and Special JS Feature
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two built-in JavaScript methods: delete
and splice
.
Other Considerations
When considering performance-critical code, it's essential to think about the following:
splice
due to its more efficient memory management.delete
might lead to slower performance due to repeated checks. In such cases, using a data structure like a linked list or a set can improve performance.Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring more microbenchmarks or alternative approaches, MeasureThat.net offers a wide range of benchmarks covering various aspects of JavaScript performance. Some examples include:
push
, pop
, shift
, unshift
)Keep in mind that each benchmark has its unique characteristics and use cases. Feel free to explore MeasureThat.net to find more information and insights into JavaScript performance.