var array = new Array(10000);
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i];
}
for (var i of array) {
array[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
for of |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 1832.9 Ops/sec |
for of | 3224.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and some of the pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches for iterating over an array in JavaScript: traditional for
loops and the new for...of
loop syntax.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code creates a large array (array
) with 10,000 elements. This setup is used to test performance.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, which suggests that this benchmark focuses solely on JavaScript performance and does not consider other factors like DOM manipulation or network interactions.
Individual Test Cases
The two individual test cases are:
for
loopfor (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i];
}
This traditional approach uses a manual index variable (i
) to iterate over the array elements.
for...of
loop syntaxfor (var i of array) {
array[i];
}
The new for...of
loop syntax allows iterating directly over the values in an array without manually managing indices.
Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each approach:
Traditional for
Loop
Pros:
Cons:
for...of
Loop Syntax
Pros:
for
loops due to optimized execution plansCons:
Library Used: None
The benchmark does not use any external libraries, focusing solely on vanilla JavaScript.
Special JS Feature or Syntax: for...of
Loop
The for...of
loop syntax is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows iterating directly over array values without manual index management, which can lead to more concise and expressive code. However, its adoption has been gradual, and not all developers are familiar with it yet.
Other Alternatives
If the benchmark were to compare these approaches under different conditions or with additional performance-critical features enabled, other alternatives might be considered:
forEach()
method: While not as performant as for...of
, forEach()
is a widely supported and concise alternative for iterating over arrays.Float32Array
or Int8Array
might offer better performance benefits.In summary, this benchmark compares two fundamental JavaScript iteration approaches: traditional for
loops and the new for...of
loop syntax. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach is essential for choosing the most suitable method for specific use cases.