function popLast() {
var arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
const element = arr.pop();
return element;
}
function indexLast() {
var arr = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];
const element = arr[arr.lenght - 1];
return element;
}
popLast();
indexLast();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
pop check | |
last-index check |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
pop check | 58603360.0 Ops/sec |
last-index check | 36346192.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and understand what's being tested in this benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches for accessing an element at the end of an array: the pop
method and the last index check (arr[arr.length - 1]
).
Options compared
Two options are being compared:
pop
method removes and returns the last element from the array.Pros and Cons of each approach:
length
property of the array, which can be slower than the pop
method.Library and its purpose
In this benchmark, no external libraries are used. The script preparation code defines two functions (popLast
and indexLast
) that demonstrate the different approaches for accessing an element at the end of an array.
Special JS feature or syntax
None mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript arrays have undergone changes over time, such as with the introduction of let
, const
, and arrow functions
. MeasureThat.net might be using a version of JavaScript that is older than some modern browsers.
Other alternatives
In theory, other approaches could be used to access an element at the end of an array:
splice
or concat
: Removing and re-indexing elements.However, these alternatives might not be as efficient or straightforward as the pop
method or last index check in this specific benchmark.
I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in MeasureThat.net!