var x = [1,2,3]
var a = x[0]
var a = x.pop()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
var a = x[0] | |
var a = x.pop() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
var a = x[0] | 15647807.0 Ops/sec |
var a = x.pop() | 15157385.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark and the pros and cons of different approaches.
What is being tested?
The test measures two ways to access an element at index 0 from an array x
:
x[0]
)pop()
methodOptions comparison:
Here's a brief overview of each approach:
x[0]
):x
is not an array or if the index is out of bounds.x.pop()
):undefined
instead of throwing an error if the index is out of bounds.Other considerations:
In addition to these two approaches, other factors that might affect performance include:
Library usage:
There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark code. However, if a library like Lodash
or Underscore.js
were used to access elements of an array, it would likely use bracket notation or similar techniques.
Special JavaScript feature or syntax:
None are mentioned in this specific benchmark.
Benchmark preparation code and individual test cases:
The script preparation code creates an array x
with a single element [1,2,3]
. The individual test cases access the first element of the array using either bracket notation (x[0]
) or the pop()
method. These test cases are likely designed to measure the performance difference between these two approaches.
Latest benchmark result:
The results show that Chrome 102 on a desktop device with Mac OS X 10.15.7 executed both test cases:
x[0]
): approximately 15647807 executions per secondpop()
method: approximately 15157385 executions per secondIn this specific case, bracket notation seems to be slightly faster than the pop()
method. However, it's essential to note that these results may vary depending on the specific use case and environment.