var arr = [1, 3, 5, 11, 13];
arr.slice(-1);
arr.pop();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Slice | |
Pop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Slice | 10855053.0 Ops/sec |
Pop | 12805164.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for removing the last element from an array in JavaScript: using the slice()
method with a negative index, and using the pop()
method.
Options compared:
Two options are being compared:
arr.slice(-1)
: This approach creates a new array that includes all elements up to but not including the last one.arr.pop()
: This approach removes the last element from the original array and returns it as a value.Pros and Cons of each approach:
slice()
method with negative index:pop()
method (see below)pop()
method:slice()
method with negative index (since it modifies the original array)slice()
Library and purpose:
The benchmark does not explicitly mention any libraries, but it is likely that the arrays (arr
) are being created using built-in JavaScript objects.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard array methods. It's a simple example of comparing two common approaches for removing elements from an array.
Other alternatives:
There may be other ways to remove elements from an array in JavaScript, such as using splice()
with negative indices, but these are similar to the slice()
method and pop()
method compared in this benchmark. Other alternatives might include using a different data structure, like a linked list or a stack, which could offer better performance for certain use cases.
Alternative approaches:
Some alternative approaches that are not mentioned in the provided benchmark might include:
splice()
with negative indices: While similar to the slice()
method, splice()
can be more flexible and allow removing multiple elements at once.Keep in mind that these alternative approaches are not mentioned in the provided benchmark and may require additional consideration of their implications.