new Array(500).fill(false)
Array(500).fill(false)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Array() | |
Array() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Array() | 1783745.1 Ops/sec |
Array() | 1682214.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases that compare the performance of creating filled arrays using new Array()
versus Array()
. The test case uses JavaScript, specifically the fill()
method to fill an array with a specific value (in this case, false
).
Options compared:
fill()
method. It's the traditional way of creating arrays in JavaScript.Array
constructor function.Pros and Cons:
Library:
There is no explicitly mentioned library used in this benchmark. However, the fill()
method is a built-in JavaScript method that's part of the language itself.
Special JS feature or syntax:
The use of shorthand syntax (Array()
) is a specific feature introduced in ECMAScript 2009 (ES5). It allows for more concise array literals, making it easier to write code. This feature has been widely adopted and is supported by most modern JavaScript engines.
Other alternatives:
In addition to new Array()
and Array()
, there are other ways to create arrays in JavaScript:
fill()
method.new Array()
or Array()
methods.Overall, the choice between new Array()
and Array()
depends on personal preference, coding style, and performance considerations. The benchmark provides a simple way to compare these two approaches in terms of execution speed.