new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
Array.from({ length: 500 }, () => 0)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Array() | |
Array.from() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Array() | 528599.1 Ops/sec |
Array.from() | 14979.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark.
What is being tested:
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test, specifically comparing two methods to create filled arrays in JavaScript:
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
Array.from({ length: 500 }, () => 0)
These tests measure the performance difference between these two approaches.
Options being compared:
The main options being compared are:
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
(first test case)Array.from({ length: 500 }, () => 0)
(second test case)Pros and Cons of each approach:
new Array()
):Other considerations:
When choosing between these approaches, consider the specific use case and requirements. If you need a simple, lightweight solution for small arrays, new Array()
might suffice. However, if you're working with larger datasets or require more flexibility, Array.from()
with a callback function is likely a better choice.
Library used:
In this test, there are no external libraries explicitly mentioned. However, some modern JavaScript features (e.g., arrow functions) rely on additional libraries like Babel to support older browsers.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no special JS features or syntax specifically highlighted in this benchmark. The tests focus on the performance difference between two well-established array creation methods.
Alternative approaches:
If you need an alternative way to create arrays, consider using:
Array.prototype.fill()
: A more modern and efficient method for filling arrays.Array.from() without a callback function
: You can use Array.from()
with no callback function to create an empty array or fill it with primitive values (e.g., numbers).lodash
, which provide additional functions for working with arrays.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be specifically suited for the performance-critical scenario depicted in this benchmark.