Array(500).fill(false)
Array.from({length:500}).fill(false)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array() | |
Array.from() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array() | 1277155.9 Ops/sec |
Array.from() | 66538.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark, named "Array() vs Array.from() fill", compares the performance of creating filled arrays using two different methods: Array()
and Array.from()
. The goal is to determine which method is faster and more efficient.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
Array()
: This method creates a new array instance by calling the Array()
constructor, followed by the fill()
method to populate it with a specified value.Array.from()
: This method creates a new array instance from an iterable source, such as an object or another array, using the spread operator (...
) and the from()
method.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Array()
:Array.from()
:Array()
.Library Used
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, Array.from()
relies on the built-in from
method of JavaScript arrays, which may have some underlying library or framework dependencies (e.g., ECMAScript 2015+ features).
Special JS Feature/Syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in this example.
Other Considerations
When benchmarking these two approaches, it's essential to consider factors like:
These considerations can impact the performance difference between Array()
and Array.from()
.
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative methods or libraries to create filled arrays, some options include:
new Int32Array(length)
: Creates a typed array instance with a specified length.new Float64Array(length)
: Creates a typed array instance with a specified length and data type.Array(500).fill(0)
: A more concise alternative to Array().fill(false)
, using an integer value (0) instead of a boolean value.Note that these alternatives might not be as efficient or readable as the original methods, but they can provide different trade-offs in terms of performance and code complexity.