var timestamp = null;
timestamp = Date()
timestamp = new Date().toString()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Date.now() | |
new Date().getTime(); |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Date.now() | 1489216.9 Ops/sec |
new Date().getTime(); | 1460280.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two ways of obtaining the current timestamp in JavaScript: Date.now()
and new Date().getTime()
.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code for both benchmarks is identical:
var timestamp = null;
This line sets a variable named timestamp
to null
, which will be used to store the result of each benchmark. This is likely a precautionary measure to ensure that the test starts with an empty value, as we'll see later.
Benchmark Definition
The first benchmark definition is:
"timestamp = Date()"
This line uses the built-in Date
constructor without calling it explicitly, relying on its implicit behavior. The Date()
function returns a new Date
object in JavaScript.
The second benchmark definition is:
"timestamp = new Date().toString()"
This line creates a new Date
object using the new Date()
syntax and then calls its toString()
method to get a string representation of the timestamp. However, since we're only interested in the numeric value, this approach might not be as efficient.
Test Cases
The two test cases are:
Date.now()
function, which returns the number of milliseconds elapsed since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC).new Date()
syntax and then calls its getTime()
method to get a numeric value representing the timestamp.Library and Special JavaScript Features
In this benchmark, no libraries or special JavaScript features are used beyond what's built into the language.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here are some pros and cons for each approach:
Date.now()
new Date().getTime();
Date.now()
Date
objectOther Alternatives
If you were considering alternative approaches, here are a few options:
Date.prototype.valueOf()
: This method returns the primitive value of the date object. While it's not as efficient as Date.now()
, it might be faster than new Date().getTime();
.Intl.DateTimeFormat
.valueOf()`: This approach uses an Internationalization API to get the timestamp. However, this method is more complex and less well-supported across browsers.performance.now()
: Some modern JavaScript environments, like WebAssembly, provide a performance.now()
function that returns the time in nanoseconds since the Unix epoch. However, this function might not be available or compatible with all browsers.In summary, the benchmark is designed to compare two simple ways of getting the current timestamp in JavaScript: using the built-in Date.now()
function and calling methods on a newly created Date
object. The results highlight the efficiency benefits of using native functions like Date.now()
.