var x = new Date().getTime();
var x = Date.now();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Date().getTime() | |
Date.now() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Date().getTime() | 4671138.5 Ops/sec |
Date.now() | 4907316.5 Ops/sec |
What is being tested:
MeasureThat.net is testing two ways to get the current time in JavaScript: Date.now()
and new Date().getTime()
. The benchmark aims to determine which method is faster.
Options compared:
There are two options being compared:
Date.now()
: This function returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch (January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC) as an integer.new Date().getTime()
: This expression creates a new Date
object and returns the timestamp (number of milliseconds since the Unix Epoch) of that date in milliseconds.Pros and Cons of each approach:
Date.now()
:new Date().getTime()
:Date.now()
.Library used:
None explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's likely that MeasureThat.net is using a JavaScript engine or browser implementation that provides these functions.
Special JS feature/syntax:
The benchmark uses no special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what is standard for JavaScript. No ES6+ features, async/await, or other advanced constructs are used.
Other alternatives:
If you need to compare times in JavaScript, other options might include:
performance.now()
: This function returns the number of milliseconds since the performance measure started.Date.prototype.getTime()
: Some older browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer) may support this method for getting the timestamp.Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().timeZone
: This property is not well-supported across browsers and requires access to the local timezone.In general, Date.now()
remains a popular choice due to its simplicity and widespread support, but the best approach depends on your specific use case and requirements.