var timestamp = null;
timestamp = Date.now();
timestamp = new Date().getTime();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Date.now() | |
new Date().getTime(); |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Date.now() | 14926900.0 Ops/sec |
new Date().getTime(); | 11432506.0 Ops/sec |
Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmarking test case for measuring the performance difference between Date.now()
and new Date().getTime()
. This test is designed to evaluate the speed of these two functions in different browsers.
What's being tested?
Two functions are compared:
Date.now()
: Returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970) as a 32-bit integer.new Date().getTime()
: Returns the number of milliseconds since the Unix epoch (January 1, 1970) as a 64-bit integer.Options being compared
The test case is comparing the performance of these two functions in different browsers.
Pros and Cons:
Date.now()
:new Date().getTime()
.new Date().getTime()
:Date.now()
.Other considerations
The choice between Date.now()
and new Date().getTime()
depends on the specific use case:
Date.now()
when:new Date().getTime()
when:Library and special JS feature
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features mentioned in the benchmarking test case. It solely focuses on comparing two native functions within JavaScript.
Other alternatives
If you want to measure the performance of other date-related functions or compare them with non-native JavaScript functions, you might consider using alternative benchmarks or libraries, such as:
Date.now()
vs performance.now()
: A comparison between the two methods for measuring elapsed time.new Date().getTime()
vs Date.parse()
: An evaluation of the performance differences between these two functions for parsing dates.Keep in mind that each test case requires careful consideration of the specific requirements and constraints of your application.