Benchmark: Array fill vs fill/from vs apply vs join

Tests:

Fill
new Array(5).fill('abc');
Fill/From
Array.from({ length: 5 }).fill('abc')
Apply
Array.apply(null, Array(3)).map(_ => 'abc')
Join (only with single characters!)
Array(6).join('a').split('');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Fill
Fill/From
Apply
Join (only with single characters!)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what each part represents.

**Benchmark Definition**

The `Name` field specifies the name of the benchmark, which in this case is "Array fill vs fill/from vs apply vs join".

The `Description` field provides a brief description of the benchmark, indicating that it's comparing different ways to fill an array with repeated elements.

The `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` fields are empty, suggesting that no specific code needs to be written before running the benchmark. This is likely because the test cases use built-in JavaScript methods or functions to generate arrays.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case represents a different way to fill an array with repeated elements:

1. **Fill**: Uses the `new Array(5).fill('abc')` syntax, which creates a new array with 5 elements, all set to the string 'abc'.
2. **Fill/From**: Uses the `Array.from({ length: 5 }).fill('abc')` syntax, which uses the `Array.from()` method to create an array from an object with a specified length, and then fills it with repeated elements.
3. **Apply**: Uses the `Array.apply(null, Array(3)).map(_ => 'abc')` syntax, which applies the `Array.prototype.map()` function to an array created using `Array.apply()`.
4. **Join (only with single characters!)**: Uses the `Array(6).join('a').split(';')` syntax, which creates an array with 6 elements, joins them together into a string with 'a' as the separator, and then splits the resulting string into individual elements.

**Test Results**

The test results are presented in a JSON format, showing the following information for each browser:

* `RawUAString`: The raw User Agent string sent by the browser.
* `Browser`: The name of the browser.
* `DevicePlatform`: The type of device platform (Desktop or Mobile).
* `OperatingSystem`: The operating system used.
* `ExecutionsPerSecond`: The average number of executions per second for each test case.

**Library and Special JS Features**

None of the provided JSON data mentions specific libraries, but it does use built-in JavaScript methods such as:

* `Array.prototype.fill()`
* `Array.from()`
* `Array.prototype.map()`

The `apply()` method is a special method in JavaScript that can be used to invoke a function with an array as its first argument.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for filling arrays with repeated elements include:

* Using the spread operator (`[...new Array(5)]`) or the repeat function (if available) to create an array.
* Using a loop to push each element onto the array.
* Using a library like Lodash, which provides various utility functions, including `repeat()`.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:120.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/120.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 120 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Fill	67426752.0 Ops/sec
Fill/From	31709952.0 Ops/sec
Apply	9934439.0 Ops/sec
Join (only with single characters!)	6197903.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array fill vs fill/from vs apply vs join (version: 0)

Fill an array with repeated elements

Comparing performance of: Fill vs Fill/From vs Apply vs Join (only with single characters!)

Created: 11 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Fill

Fill/From

Apply

Join (only with single characters!)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):