var array = new Array(100);
var arrayLength = array.length;
for (var i = 0; i < arrayLength; i++) {
array[i];
}
array.forEach(function(item, index) {
return item;
});
array.some(function(item, index) {
return item === array[index];
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
foreach | |
some |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 75784.5 Ops/sec |
foreach | 2449016.2 Ops/sec |
some | 1174528.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case that compares the performance of three different loop constructs: for
, foreach
, and some
. The test aims to measure which approach is faster in terms of execution time.
Loop Options Compared:
i
) to iterate over an array.forEach
method, which provides two arguments: the current element and its index.Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
for
loops, as it avoids explicit index management.Library Used: None
The test does not use any external libraries or frameworks. The code is self-contained and relies solely on the built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Features/Syntax: None mentioned
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of three basic loop constructs.
Other Alternatives:
for
loops that uses a conditional statement to control the iteration.for
, foreach
, or some
.In conclusion, this benchmark test case provides a simple and informative comparison of three basic loop constructs in JavaScript: for
, foreach
, and some
. The results can help developers optimize their code for better performance.