var array = new Array(100);
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
array[i];
}
array.forEach(function(item, index) {
array[i];
});
array.some(function(item, index) {
array[i];
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
foreach | |
some |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 6302337.0 Ops/sec |
foreach | 12955995.0 Ops/sec |
some | 12845109.0 Ops/sec |
Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test compares the performance of three different loop constructs: for
, foreach
, and some
.
Loop Constructs Comparison
for
loop iterates over an array using a counter variable (i
) that increments at each iteration.foreach
loop iterates over an array using a callback function, which is called for each element in the array.some
loop iterates over an array and returns true as soon as it finds an element that satisfies a given condition.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
for
loops, especially when dealing with array-like objects or iterables.for
loops, as it only iterates over elements that satisfy the condition.Library and Special JavaScript Features
None of the provided test cases use a specific library. However, some browsers may have additional features or optimizations that can affect the performance of these loop constructs.
Other Considerations
Alternative Loops
There are other JavaScript loops that can be used in addition to the for
, foreach
, and some
loops:
while
loop that executes at least once before checking the condition.It's worth noting that JavaScript has other data structures and iteration methods, such as iterators, generators, and array methods like map
, filter
, and reduce
, which can be used for iteration.