var array = new Array(1000).fill(1);
array.forEach(function(i) {
array[i];
});
for (var i of array) {
array[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
foreach | |
for..of |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
foreach | 1168353.2 Ops/sec |
for..of | 960613.6 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined in two parts:
new Array(1000).fill(1);
. The purpose of this code is to provide a common starting point for both loop types.Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
foreach
The first test case uses the forEach
method with a callback function:
array.forEach(function(i) {
array[i];
});
This is an older way of iterating over arrays in JavaScript. The forEach
method executes a callback function once for each element in the array, passing the current index as an argument.
Pros:
Cons:
for...of
for..of
The second test case uses the for...of
loop:
for (var i of array) {
array[i];
};
This is a newer way of iterating over arrays in JavaScript. The for...of
loop executes a block of code once for each element in the array, with the current index passed as an argument.
Pros:
Cons:
Library: Lodash
The forEach
method is part of the Lodash library, which provides a collection of functional programming helpers. The use of Lodash may affect the benchmark results.
Pros:
Cons:
Special JS Feature/Syntax: None
Neither of these loop types uses any special JavaScript feature or syntax that requires explanation.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative loop types, consider the following options:
Array.prototype.forEach.call()
: This method is similar to Lodash's forEach
but without the library.for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { ... }
: This traditional for
loop can also be used for array iteration.while (array.length > 0) { ... }
: This older while
loop can also be used, but it's generally slower and less efficient.Keep in mind that the choice of loop type often depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and browser support.