var test=Array.from({length: 20000},()=>Math.random())
[test.slice(0,50),test.slice(51)]
test.filter((e,i)=>i!=50)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
filter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 13932.5 Ops/sec |
filter | 13201.3 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being measured.
What is tested:
The benchmark measures the performance of two JavaScript methods: Array.prototype.slice()
and Array.prototype.filter()
. Specifically, it tests how fast these methods can create a new array by selecting a subset of elements from an existing array. The test creates an array of 20,000 random numbers using Array.from()
, and then uses each method to extract two different subsets of the same size (50 elements) from the original array.
Options compared:
The benchmark compares two approaches:
slice()
: This method returns a shallow copy of a portion of an array, starting from the index specified by start
and ending at the index before end
.filter()
: This method creates a new array with all elements that pass the test implemented by the provided function.Pros and cons:
slice()
:filter()
, as it only needs to access the original array's indices, whereas filter()
needs to iterate over each element.filter()
:slice()
, as it can be used to filter out multiple conditions, not just based on indices.slice()
, due to the overhead of iterating over each element.Other considerations:
Both methods have a time complexity of O(n), where n is the length of the array. However, in practice, filter()
may perform worse than expected if the function being filtered has a high number of iterations or side effects, as it can lead to more work being done by the browser's garbage collector.
Library and purpose:
The Array.from()
method is a built-in JavaScript method that creates a new array from an iterable (e.g., an array literal, a string, or a function). Its purpose is to provide a convenient way to create arrays in a more expressive and flexible manner.
Special JS feature/syntax:
None of the code mentioned uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect its performance. However, it's worth noting that using Array.prototype.slice()
and Array.prototype.filter()
can lead to memory allocation issues if not used carefully, as they create new arrays with copied references.
Other alternatives:
If you need a more efficient way to select subsets of an array, you may consider using:
Array.prototype.subarray()
: This method is similar to slice()
, but it also includes the specified end index in the resulting subarray.Array.prototype.map()
, Array.prototype.reduce()
, or other methods that process arrays with a callback function: These methods can provide more flexibility, but may have different performance characteristics depending on the specific use case.Keep in mind that the choice of method ultimately depends on your specific requirements and constraints.