var test=Array.from({length: 10000000},()=>Math.random())
test.slice(0, 4)
test.filter((e,i)=>i!=4)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
filter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 37466920.0 Ops/sec |
filter | 4.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and its implications.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two test cases: slice
and filter
. These functions are part of the JavaScript Array prototype, which allows you to manipulate arrays in various ways. The benchmark tests these two functions on a large array (10000000
) with random elements.
Options compared
In this benchmark, the two options being compared are:
slice
: This function returns a new array containing the elements of the original array, starting from index 0 and taking a specified number of elements (in this case, 4).filter
: This function creates a new array with all elements that pass a provided test.Pros and Cons of each approach
Library
There is no external library used in this benchmark. Both slice
and filter
are built-in JavaScript functions.
Special JS feature or syntax
None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in optimizing array manipulation, here are some alternative approaches:
slice()
or filter()
, consider using map()
to create a new array with transformed elements.reduce()
to accumulate the elements that meet the condition, instead of using filter()
.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can be significant, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific use case and requirements.
The benchmark's results will help you determine which approach is faster for your particular scenario.