var test=Array.from({length: 6000},()=>Math.random())
[test.slice(100,200)]
test.filter((e,i)=> i>=100 && i<=200)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
filter |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 1421008.6 Ops/sec |
filter | 21000.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares the performance of two approaches: using slice
and filter
to extract a subset of elements from an array. Specifically, both tests aim to find all elements within the range 1000-2000 in the generated array.
Options compared
There are only two options being compared:
slice()
method extracts a specified number of elements from an array and returns them as a new array.filter()
method creates a new array with all elements that pass a test implemented by a provided function.Pros and Cons
Library and Purpose
There is no specific library mentioned in this benchmark. However, Array.prototype.slice()
and Array.prototype.filter()
are built-in JavaScript methods that operate on arrays.
Special JS feature or syntax
There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark aside from using array methods (slice
and filter
). If you're interested in exploring other advanced topics, there's always room for that!
Other alternatives
If you'd like to explore alternative approaches, consider the following:
Array.prototype.reduce()
to accumulate elements within a certain range.Array.prototype.map()
in combination with filtering logic (e.g., map((x) => x >= 100 && x <= 200)
).for
loops, which might offer different performance characteristics.Feel free to ask if you have any further questions or would like to discuss more!