var array = [1,2,3];
array.unshift(0);
array = array.concat([0])
array = [0, array]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrayUnshift | |
arrayConcat | |
arraySpread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrayUnshift | 14243.5 Ops/sec |
arrayConcat | 386.4 Ops/sec |
arraySpread | 92.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark definition provides basic information about the test, including:
Name
: The name of the benchmark, which is "spread vs concat vs unshift".Description
: A brief description of the test, which is also "spread vs concat vs unshift". This suggests that the test is comparing the performance of three different methods for inserting an element into an array: unshift
, concat
, and spread syntax (...
).Script Preparation Code
: A JavaScript code snippet that prepares a sample array before running the benchmark. In this case, the array is initialized with values [1, 2, 3]
.Html Preparation Code
: An empty string, indicating that no HTML preparation code is required.Individual Test Cases
The test cases define individual benchmarks to be compared:
arrayUnshift
: This benchmark tests the performance of inserting an element into the array using the unshift
method.arrayConcat
: This benchmark tests the performance of inserting an element into the array using the concat
method.arraySpread
: This benchmark tests the performance of inserting an element into the array using the spread syntax (...
).Library and Special Features
There are no libraries mentioned in the provided code snippets.
However, there is a special feature being tested: the use of spread syntax (...
) for array creation and insertion. The spread syntax was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as a way to create new arrays from existing ones or other iterable objects.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
unshift
: This method modifies the original array by adding elements to the beginning. It has the advantage of being an in-place operation, but it also requires shifting all existing elements, which can lead to performance issues for large arrays.concat
: This method creates a new array and returns a reference to it. It's generally faster than unshift
, but it also creates a new object, which can be memory-intensive.spread syntax (
...`) : This method creates a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array. It's often considered the most efficient way to create arrays, as it avoids the overhead of creating a new object or shifting elements.Other Alternatives
If unshift
and concat
were not available, other alternatives might include:
Array.prototype.slice()
method.cloneDeep()
function to create a deep copy of the original array.However, these alternatives would likely be less efficient and more complex than the original approaches being tested.