var array = [1,2,3];
array.slice().unshift(0);
array = array.concat([0])
array = [0, array]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | |
arrayConcat123 | |
arraySpread123 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | 4902694.0 Ops/sec |
arrayConcat123 | 5524.7 Ops/sec |
arraySpread123 | 511.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the test case. Here's what it represents:
Name
: The name of the benchmark, which is "spread vs concat vs unshift22".Description
: A brief description of the test case, which explains that it compares the performance of three different approaches: unshift
, concat
, and spread operator (...
).Script Preparation Code
: A JavaScript code snippet that prepares the test array before running the benchmark. In this case, the array is initialized with values [1, 2, 3]
.Html Preparation Code
: An empty string, indicating that no HTML preparation code is needed for this benchmark.Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of three individual test cases, each represented by a JSON object:
arrayUnshift123
:Benchmark Definition
: A JavaScript code snippet that tests the performance of unshift(0)
on an array slice.arrayConcat123
:Benchmark Definition
: A JavaScript code snippet that tests the performance of concat([0])
on an array variable.arraySpread123
:Benchmark Definition
: A JavaScript code snippet that tests the performance of [0, ...array]
, using the spread operator to create a new array with the original array's values.Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of three different approaches:
unshift(0)
: This approach modifies the original array by adding an element at the beginning.concat([0])
: This approach creates a new array by concatenating the original array with a single-element array [0]
.[0, ...array]
): This approach creates a new array by duplicating each element of the original array.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
unshift(0)
: Pros:concat([0])
: Pros:[0, ...array]
): Pros:Libraries and Special Features
None of these test cases rely on any external libraries or special features. They are pure JavaScript operations that can be executed anywhere.
Other Alternatives
If you want to compare the performance of other approaches, some alternatives could include:
push(0)
instead of unshift(0)
.slice()
with a negative start index instead of concat([0])
.Array.prototype.set()
or Array.prototype.fill()
instead of spread operator ([0, ...array]
).Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs, so be sure to test them thoroughly before using them in production code.