var array = [1,2,3];
array.unshift(0);
array = [0].concat(array)
array = [0,array]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | |
arrayConcat123 | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | 31335.6 Ops/sec |
arrayConcat123 | 1229.5 Ops/sec |
spread | 149.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested.
The benchmark is comparing three approaches to concatenate or modify an array:
array.unshift(0);
array = [0].concat(array)
[0,...array]
These approaches are being compared in terms of performance, specifically execution speed.
Unshift Approach (array.unshift(0))
This approach adds a new element to the beginning of the array using the unshift()
method. The purpose of adding 0 is likely to make it easier to measure the effect of unshifting on the array size.
Pros:
Cons:
Concatenation Approach (array = [0].concat(array))
This approach creates a new array by concatenating an existing array with a single-element array containing 0.
Pros:
Cons:
Spread Approach ([0,...array])
This approach uses the spread operator (...
) to create a new array by spreading the elements of the original array.
Pros:
Cons:
Library/Functionality Considerations
None of these approaches rely on specific libraries or functions beyond JavaScript's built-in array methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax Consideration
There are no special features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing three basic array modification approaches.
Other Alternatives
For a more comprehensive benchmark, you might consider including additional approaches, such as:
Array.prototype.push()
with an initial valueArray.prototype.splice()
to modify the original arrayArray.from()
cloneDeep()
or merge()
functionsThese alternatives might provide more nuanced insights into performance characteristics, but may also add complexity to the benchmark.