String.prototype.replaceAll = function(search, replacement) {
var target = this;
return target.replace(new RegExp(search, 'g'), replacement);
};
"this is it".replace(/ /g, "+");
"this is it".replaceAll(" ", "+");
"this is it".split(" ").join("+");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
replace regex | |
replace All | |
string split join |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
replace regex | 11494558.0 Ops/sec |
replace All | 6145420.5 Ops/sec |
string split join | 14006131.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare three different approaches for replacing or manipulating strings:
replaceAll
: a custom implementation of string replacement using a loop.replace
: a standard JavaScript method for regular expression-based string replacement.split
and join
: methods for splitting a string into an array and then joining it back together with a separator.Options Compared
The three options are compared in terms of performance, specifically the number of executions per second on a given device platform (Desktop).
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
replaceAll
:replace
:split
and join
:Library Used
None, the benchmark uses standard JavaScript methods (replaceAll
, replace
, split
, and join
) without any external libraries.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different string manipulation approaches.
Other Alternatives
If you were to design an alternative benchmark, you might consider:
Feel free to ask if you'd like me to elaborate on any of these points!