String.prototype.replaceAll = function(search, replacement) {
var target = this;
return target.replace(new RegExp(search, 'g'), replacement);
};
"this is it".replace(/ /g, "+");
"this is it".replaceAll(/ /, "+");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
replace regex | |
replace All |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
replace regex | 13253964.0 Ops/sec |
replace All | 5949685.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Overview
The benchmark tests two approaches to replace characters in a string: using String.prototype.replaceAll
(referred to as "replace All") and using regular expressions with the replace()
method (referred to as "replace Regex").
Options Compared
replaceAll()
method, which replaces all occurrences of a substring in a string.g
flag (global match), which means it will only replace the first occurrence of the substring.g
flag, which allows for global matching.replaceAll()
for simple replacements.Library/ Framework Considerations
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that both approaches rely on JavaScript's built-in string manipulation methods.
Special JS Features/Syntax
None are mentioned in this specific benchmark definition. However, it's worth mentioning that some other benchmarks might test features like let
, const
, or modern syntax like template literals or async/await.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to measure the performance of these approaches using a different method, here are some alternatives:
In summary, this benchmark tests two approaches to string replacement: using String.prototype.replaceAll
(custom implementation) and regular expressions with the replace()
method (traditional approach). It compares their performance on different browsers and devices.