Benchmark: testtest321523453125

Tests:

array
[1].includes(1)
int
1 === 1

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
array
int

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/116.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 116 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
array	1011351744.0 Ops/sec
int	1011684544.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark in question is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript on various browsers and devices. It consists of two individual test cases: "array" and "int".

**Options Compared**

In this benchmark, we have two options compared:

1. `includes()` function on an array
2. Equality comparison (`===`) between two integers

These options are compared because they represent different aspects of JavaScript performance:

* The `includes()` function is a built-in method that searches for a specific value within an array.
* Equality comparison is a fundamental operation in JavaScript that checks if two values have the same value and type.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **`includes()` function**:
	* Pros: This approach tests the performance of the `includes()` function, which is a commonly used method for searching arrays.
	* Cons: The performance impact of this operation can vary depending on the size of the array and the value being searched for.
2. **Equality comparison (`===`)**:
	* Pros: Equality comparison is a fundamental operation that tests the correctness of code.
	* Cons: This approach may not accurately represent real-world scenarios, as equality checks are often used in more complex expressions.

**Library Used**

In this benchmark, there doesn't appear to be any explicit library used. However, it's likely that the JavaScript engine being tested is a browser engine (e.g., Blink for Chrome or Gecko for Firefox), which may have built-in optimizations and features that affect performance.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. The focus is on testing the performance of basic operations like array searching and equality comparison.

**Other Alternatives**

To test similar benchmarks, you could consider using other tools and frameworks, such as:

1. **Benchmarking libraries**: Libraries like Benchmark.js or js-benchmark can help you create and run benchmarks in Node.js.
2. **WebAssembly-based benchmarks**: WebAssembly (WASM) provides a way to run benchmarking code on multiple platforms, including browsers and operating systems.
3. **JavaScript engines**: You could also test the performance of different JavaScript engines, such as V8 for Chrome or SpiderMonkey for Firefox.

Keep in mind that each benchmarking tool and framework has its own strengths and weaknesses, and may be better suited to specific use cases or requirements.

Related benchmarks:

testtest321523453125 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: array vs int

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

array

int

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):