var position = 20;
var testString = "А еще можно символы в массиве хранить. Сплайсом вставлять символ и джойнить перед выводом";
var testArray = testString.split ``;
var newChar = "X";
testArray.splice(position, 0, newChar);
let result = testArray.join``;
let result = testString.substring(0, position) + newChar + testString.substring(position)
let result = testString.slice(0, position) + newChar + testString.slice(position)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Массивы | |
Строки | |
Slice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Массивы | 2193.3 Ops/sec |
Строки | 23346570.0 Ops/sec |
Slice | 13101584.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains information about the test case, including:
position
(set to 20), testString
, and an empty array testArray
. The script also defines a new character newChar
.Test Cases
The benchmark consists of three test cases:
splice()
. The benchmark runs the following script:testArray.splice(position, 0, newChar);
let result = testArray.join``;
This test case is likely measuring the overhead of modifying an array by inserting a new element.
+=
). The benchmark runs the following script:let result = testString.substring(0, position) + newChar + testString.substring(position);
This test case is likely measuring the overhead of concatenating two strings.
slice()
. The benchmark runs the following script:let result = testString.slice(0, position) + newChar + testString.slice(position);
This test case is likely measuring the overhead of slicing a string.
Library and Special JS Features
In all three test cases, the following libraries are used:
Array.prototype.splice()
: This method modifies an array by inserting or removing elements.String.prototype.substring()
: This method extracts a substring from a string.String.prototype.slice()
: This method extracts a portion of a string.No special JavaScript features or syntax (e.g., async/await, generators) are used in these test cases.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of the pros and cons of each approach:
Other Alternatives
Some alternative methods that could be used in these test cases include:
concat()
instead of concatenation using the +=
operator.Array.prototype.push()
and modifying an existing array.However, these alternatives might not provide meaningful results or are less representative of real-world use cases.
The current benchmark design provides a simple, straightforward way to measure the performance differences between these three methods. However, depending on the specific requirements and use cases, more complex scenarios or alternative approaches might be necessary.