Benchmark: Friday - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

Van
isSastry=n=>((+`${n}${n+1}`)**.5)%1==0 isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Martin
const isSastry = (num) => Number.isInteger(Math.sqrt(`${num}${num + 1}`)) isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Peter
const isSastry = (number) => { const totString = String(number) + String(number+1) const squareRoot = Math.sqrt(totString); return squareRoot%1===0; } isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Ana
function isSastry(number) { if (Math.sqrt(+`${number}${number+1}`) % 1 !== 0) {return false} else { return true} } isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Tim
function isSastry(n) { return Math.sqrt(parseInt(n.toString() + (n + 1).toString())) % 1 == 0; } isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Sadok
function isSastry(number) { const checkNumber = Number.isInteger(number); if (checkNumber) { const secondNn = number + 1; const myNumber = number.toString()+secondNn.toString() return Number.isInteger(Math.sqrt(myNumber)); } } isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)
Luke
function isSastry (value) { const increment = value + 1; const fullNumber = Number("" + value + increment); const perfectsq = Math.sqrt(fullNumber) return Number.isInteger(perfectsq); } isSastry(183) isSastry(184) isSastry(106755) isSastry(129987253440921) isSastry(157175907513603) isSastry(206611570247935) isSastry(338752188230098) isSastry(433610247875715)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Van
Martin
Peter
Ana
Tim
Sadok
Luke

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of different JavaScript implementations is crucial in developing high-performance web applications.

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test case, which compares the execution speed of various JavaScript implementations for a specific mathematical expression. The expression being tested is:

`(+`${n}${n+1}`)**.5)%`

Where `n` is a variable that takes on different values.

Let's break down the different implementation approaches used in the benchmark test cases:

1. **Approach 1: Simple Arithmetic** (e.g., "Van", "Martin")
These implementations use basic arithmetic operations to calculate the square root of `fullNumber`. They do not utilize any optimized library functions or specialized algorithms.
2. **Approach 2: Integer Square Root** (e.g., "Tim", "Luke")
These implementations use a method called "integer square root" to efficiently compute the integer part of the square root. This approach is more complex and requires additional mathematical calculations.
3. **Approach 3: Binary Search** (e.g., "Sadok")
This implementation uses binary search to find the largest integer whose square is less than or equal to `fullNumber`. While this approach provides a good balance between performance and complexity.

The latest benchmark results show that:

* Chrome 94 is the fastest browser for all test cases, with an average of over 1 million executions per second.
* The order of execution speed varies across implementations: "Sadok" performs best on "Luke"'s implementation, while "Van" outperforms "Martin".
* "Tim" and "Luke"'s implementations are tied in terms of execution speed.

It's essential to note that the performance differences between these implementations may vary depending on specific use cases, system configurations, or optimization techniques employed by individual developers.

When developing high-performance web applications, it is crucial to:

1. Choose the right JavaScript implementation (e.g., V8 for Chrome, SpiderMonkey for Firefox).
2. Optimize code using techniques like memoization, caching, and parallel processing.
3. Utilize specialized libraries and frameworks optimized for performance.
4. Test and benchmark your application thoroughly to identify areas of improvement.

By following these guidelines, developers can create high-performance web applications that deliver fast and reliable results to users worldwide.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/94.0.4606.81 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 94 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Van	888847.4 Ops/sec
Martin	300285.1 Ops/sec
Peter	239799.9 Ops/sec
Ana	1065373.4 Ops/sec
Tim	274771.8 Ops/sec
Sadok	237461.8 Ops/sec
Luke	253944.8 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Friday (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Van vs Martin vs Peter vs Ana vs Tim vs Sadok vs Luke

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Van

Martin

Peter

Ana

Tim

Sadok

Luke

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):