Benchmark: Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 2)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.7.0/umbrella.min.js"></script>
<div id="test">Test</div>

Tests:

Jquery Selector (exists)
var test = $("#test")
Jquery Selector (non-existent)
var test = $("#test2")
Umbrella Selector (exists)
var test = u("#test")
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)
var test = u("#test2")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Jquery Selector (exists)
Jquery Selector (non-existent)
Umbrella Selector (exists)
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark, called "Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 2)", compares the performance of two JavaScript libraries: UmbrellaJS and jQuery. The test measures the execution speed of two specific functions: a selector function that looks for an existing element and one that looks for a non-existent element.

**Libraries Used**

1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library used for DOM manipulation, events, and Ajax requests.
2. **UmbrellaJS**: A lightweight alternative to jQuery, designed to be faster and more efficient.

**Selector Functions**

Both libraries provide selector functions: `$()` (in jQuery) and `u()` (in UmbrellaJS). These functions are used to select elements in the DOM based on a given CSS selector or attribute.

The test cases compare the performance of these selectors:

* "Jquery Selector (exists)": The function looks for an existing element with the id "test".
* "Jquery Selector (non-existent)": The function looks for an element with the id "test2", which does not exist.
* "Umbrella Selector (exists)": The function looks for an existing element with the id "test".
* "Umbrella Selector (non-existent)": The function looks for an element with the id "test2".

**Performance Comparison**

The benchmark measures the execution speed of each selector function using a specific browser and device configuration. The results are stored in the `ExecutionsPerSecond` field, which represents the number of executions per second.

In this case, the benchmark shows that:

* jQuery's selector for an existing element is slower than UmbrellaJS' equivalent.
* jQuery's selector for a non-existent element is significantly slower than both libraries' selectors for existing elements.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each library approach:

1. **jQuery**:
	* Pros: Well-established, widely adopted, and feature-rich.
	* Cons: Can be slow due to its complex implementation and DOM manipulation overhead.
2. **UmbrellaJS**:
	* Pros: Lightweight, fast, and efficient, making it suitable for performance-critical applications.
	* Cons: May lack some features and flexibility compared to jQuery.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative JavaScript libraries for DOM manipulation and event handling, consider:

1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides a functional programming style for working with arrays and objects.
2. **React**: A JavaScript library for building user interfaces, particularly suitable for complex, data-driven applications.

Keep in mind that the choice of library depends on your specific project requirements, performance needs, and personal preferences.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its results!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Jquery Selector (exists)	3781435.0 Ops/sec
Jquery Selector (non-existent)	4736181.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector (exists)	1318108.9 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)	1694002.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 2) (version: 0)

Oops I made a typo in the benchmark that affects results! Please ignore "Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 1)"

Comparing performance of: Jquery Selector (exists) vs Jquery Selector (non-existent) vs Umbrella Selector (exists) vs Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Jquery Selector (exists)

Jquery Selector (non-existent)

Umbrella Selector (exists)

Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):