Benchmark: Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 1)

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.7.0/umbrella.min.js"></script>
<div id="test">Test</div>

Tests:

Jquery Selector (exists)
var test = $("#test")
Jquery Selector (non-existant)
var test = $("#test2")
Umbrella Selector (exists)
var test = $("#test")
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)
var test = u("#test2")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Jquery Selector (exists)
Jquery Selector (non-existant)
Umbrella Selector (exists)
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided benchmark, `Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 1)`, compares the performance of two JavaScript libraries: jQuery and Umbrella. The test focuses on selecting elements using the `$` or `u` function from each library.

**Library Overview**

1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX interactions. It provides a wide range of methods and functions to simplify web development tasks.
2. **Umbrella**: A lightweight alternative to jQuery, designed to be more efficient and flexible. Umbrella is often used in modern web applications due to its smaller size and improved performance.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the following options:

1. **jQuery Selector (exists)**: This test case uses the `$` function to select an existing element with the id `test`.
2. **jQuery Selector (non-existent)**: This test case uses the `$` function to select a non-existent element with the id `test2`.
3. **Umbrella Selector (exists)**: This test case uses the `u` function to select an existing element with the id `test`.
4. **Umbrella Selector (non-existent)**: This test case uses the `u` function to select a non-existent element with the id `test2`.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **jQuery**: While jQuery is widely used and well-maintained, it has a larger size compared to Umbrella. This can lead to slower page loads and increased bandwidth usage.
	* Pros: Wide community support, extensive documentation, and feature-rich set of tools.
	* Cons: Larger size, potentially slower performance, and more overhead due to its popularity.
2. **Umbrella**: As a lightweight alternative, Umbrella is designed to be more efficient and flexible.
	* Pros: Smaller size, improved performance, and better suited for modern web applications.
	* Cons: Smaller community compared to jQuery, potentially less feature-rich set of tools.

**Special Features and Syntax**

The benchmark uses the `$` function from jQuery and the `u` function from Umbrella. Both functions are used to select elements in the DOM. The `$` function is a shorthand for `document.querySelector` or `document.querySelectorAll`, while the `u` function is a custom implementation by Umbrella.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternative JavaScript libraries, some popular options include:

1. **Lodash**: A utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array operations, and more.
2. **Moment.js**: A lightweight JavaScript library for date and time manipulation.
3. **React**: A popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces and managing state changes.

Keep in mind that each library has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your project's specific needs and requirements.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark better!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/115.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 115 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Jquery Selector (exists)	2004791.6 Ops/sec
Jquery Selector (non-existant)	2517250.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector (exists)	1989491.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector (non-existent)	999129.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Umbrella JS vs Jquery (update 1) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Jquery Selector (exists) vs Jquery Selector (non-existant) vs Umbrella Selector (exists) vs Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Jquery Selector (exists)

Jquery Selector (non-existant)

Umbrella Selector (exists)

Umbrella Selector (non-existent)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):