Benchmark: js vs Umbrella JS 2.7.0 jquery v2.2.4

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/2.7.0/umbrella.min.js"></script>
<h1 id="test">Hello World</h3>

Tests:

js
var text = document.getElementById("test");
jquery v2.2.4
var text = jQuery("#test");
umbrella v2.7.0
var text = u("#test");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
js
jquery v2.2.4
umbrella v2.7.0

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Overview of the Benchmark**

The provided benchmark, hosted on MeasureThat.net, compares the performance of three JavaScript libraries: native JavaScript (JS), jQuery version 2.2.4, and Umbrella JS version 2.7.0. The benchmark focuses on the execution time it takes to retrieve an HTML element with a specific ID using each library.

**Library Explanation**

*   **Native JavaScript**: This is the standard JavaScript language used for client-side scripting in web browsers. It doesn't require any additional libraries or dependencies.
*   **jQuery**: jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and provides a consistent way of interacting with elements on web pages. In this benchmark, it's used to retrieve an HTML element using the `$()` function.
*   **Umbrella JS**: Umbrella JS is another JavaScript library that aims to simplify DOM manipulation and provide a consistent API for interacting with elements. It's similar to jQuery but has some differences in its syntax and functionality.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares three different approaches:

1.  **Native JavaScript (JS)**: This option uses the standard `document.getElementById()` method to retrieve the HTML element.
2.  **jQuery**: This option uses the `$()` function provided by jQuery to select the HTML element.
3.  **Umbrella JS**: This option uses the `u()` function provided by Umbrella JS to select the HTML element.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

*   **Native JavaScript (JS)**:
    *   Pros: Lightweight, fast execution time, no dependencies or overhead.
    *   Cons: Requires manual DOM manipulation, less intuitive for some developers.
*   **jQuery**:
    *   Pros: Simplifies DOM manipulation, provides a consistent API, easy to learn and use.
    *   Cons: Adds extra overhead due to its library size, slower execution time compared to native JavaScript.
*   **Umbrella JS**:
    *   Pros: Provides a consistent API for DOM manipulation, similar to jQuery but with some differences in syntax.
    *   Cons: Smaller library size than jQuery, but still adds some overhead.

**Special Considerations**

The benchmark doesn't require any special JavaScript features or syntax. It focuses on the execution time of each approach and provides a fair comparison between native JavaScript, jQuery, and Umbrella JS.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to these libraries include:

*   **Lodash**: A utility library that provides functions for DOM manipulation and other common tasks.
*   **React**: A popular front-end framework for building user interfaces.
*   **AngularJS**: Another popular front-end framework for building complex web applications.
*   **Vue.js**: A progressive and flexible front-end framework for building web applications.

Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which one to use depends on the specific needs of your project.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 124 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
js	2941701.2 Ops/sec
jquery v2.2.4	1492452.5 Ops/sec
umbrella v2.7.0	282614.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

js vs Umbrella JS 2.7.0 jquery v2.2.4 (version: 0)

js vs umbrellajs vs jquery get ID

Comparing performance of: js vs jquery v2.2.4 vs umbrella v2.7.0

Created: 7 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

js

jquery v2.2.4

umbrella v2.7.0

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):